Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003852124
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011409071
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014320784
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011695100
This paper studies the relative importance of discount rates and cash flows with a focus on the differences between time-series and cross-sectional variance tests. I show that the following holds for the market, different types of portfolios, and individual stocks: (a) changes in expected...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013154202
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010357098
In our paper — “How Can ‘Smart Beta' Go Horribly Wrong?” — we show, using U.S. data, that the relative valuation of a strategy (in comparison with its own historical norms) is correlated with the strategy's subsequent return at a five-year horizon. The high past performance of many of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012947270
Past industry returns predict the cross section of industry returns, and this predictability is at its strongest at the one-month horizon (Moskowitz and Grinblatt 1999). We show that the cross section of factor returns shares this property, and that industry momentum stems from factor momentum....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012852943
In a provocative paper, Santa-Clara and Valkanov (2003) present evidence that stock market returns are much higher under Democratic presidents than Republican presidents. Their work was updated by Pastor and Veronesi (2017), who find that the effect is even stronger when the data are extended...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012957514