Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008667050
Prior to the Civil War there were three major differences among states in how U.S. banks were regulated: (1) Whether they were established by charter or under free-banking laws. (2) Whether they were permitted to branch. (3) Whether the state established a state-owned bank. I use a census of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003328071
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000703013
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001258271
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001127471
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001175094
Prior to the Civil War several states established bank liability insurance schemes of two basic types. One was an insurance fund, in which member banks paid into a state-run fund that would pay losses of bank creditors. The other was a mutual guarantee system, in which survivor banks were...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013144109
Beginning in 1864, in the United States notes of national banks were the predominant medium of exchange. Each national bank issued its own notes. E-money shares many of the characteristics of these bank notes. This paper describes some lessons relevant to emoney from the U.S. experience with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010469668
The period from 1914 to 1935 in the United States is unique in that it was the only time that both privately-issued bank notes (national bank notes) and central bank-issued bank notes (Federal Reserve notes) were simultaneously in circulation. This paper describes some lessons relevant to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011280047
This paper examines the experience of Sweden with government notes and private bank notes to determine how well the Swedish experience corresponds to that of Canada and the United States. Sweden is important to study because it has had government notes in circulation for more than 350 years, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011864604