Showing 1 - 8 of 8
The supplementary leverage ratio (SLR) rule recently imposed on the very largest U.S. banks has revived the question of whether banks sidestep such rules by shifting toward riskier, higher-yielding assets. Using difference-in-difference analysis, we find that, after the SLR was finalized in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011868525
Banks are regulated more than most firms, making them good subjects to study regulatory arbitrage (avoidance). Their latest arbitrage opportunity may be the new leverage rule covering the largest U.S. banks; leverage rules require equal capital against assets with unequal risks, so banks can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012898992
Better customer service helps banks attract core deposits and increase funding stickiness by raising depositors' switching costs and enhancing their loyalty. This funding stickiness, however, could impair market discipline and lead to excessive risk-taking. We find that banks providing better...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012936566
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001850771
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002544582
We argue that the defining feature of large and complex banks that makes their failures messy is their reliance on runnable financial liabilities that confer liquidity or money-like services that may be impaired or destroyed in bankruptcy. To make large bank failures more orderly, we advocate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013055760
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011557862
In 2010, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision published an assessment of the long-term economic impact (LEI) of stronger capital and liquidity requirements. This paper considers this assessment in light of estimates from later studies of the macroeconomic benefits and costs of higher...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012302626