Showing 1 - 10 of 14
This paper reports data from an ultimatum mini-game in which responders first had to choose whether or not to participate. Participation was costly, but the participation cost was smaller than the minimum payoff that a responder could guarantee himself in the ultimatum game. Compared to a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014212118
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003838925
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003873723
How do people trade off efficiency against equality concerns? To study this question, we conducted a modified mini ultimatum game (N=120) in which proposers were asked to choose between offering 8:2 and y:y, y∈{5, 4.5, 4,.., 0.5}; all offers in Euro. According to the data, 58 of 60 proposers...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013084331
We experimentally investigate multiple notions of equity in ultimatum bargaining with asymmetric outside options. Building on the generalized equity principle formulated by Selten (1978), we derive three different equity rules that can explain 43% of all offers. Our within-subject design further...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010191262
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008905021
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003546360
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003663000
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011482088
Using a unique experimental data set, we investigate how asymmetric legal rights shape bargainers’ aspiration levels through moral entitlements derived from equity norms and number prominence. Aspiration formation is typically hard to observe in real life. Our study involves 15 negotiations...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011771180