Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Cohen and Wang (2013) (CW2013) provide evidence consistent with market participants perceiving staggered boards to be value reducing. Amihud and Stoyanov (2016) (AS2016) contests these findings, reporting some specifications under which the results are not statistically significant. We show that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014120769
This note offers an initial response to a study released earlier this month by Martijn Cremers and Simone Sepe, “Board Declassification Activism: The Financial Value of the Shareholder Rights Project.” Putting aside methodological questions about their analysis and accepting their results...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014121313
In a paper published in the JFE in 2013, we provided evidence that market participants perceive staggered boards to be on average value-reducing. In a recent response paper, Amihud and Stoyanov (2015) “contest” our results. They advocate using alternative methods for estimating risk-adjusted...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012970551
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010255181
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011751866
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011674108
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012418996
We investigate the relationship of CEOs' political preferences (as reflected in their political contributions) with the prevalence and compensation of women in leadership positions at U.S. public companies. We find that CEOs who favor the Democratic Party (“Democratic CEOs”) are associated...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012200346
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012217115
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014335811