Showing 1 - 10 of 38
This paper explores the theoretical and empirical implications of time-varying and unobservable beta. Investors infer factor loadings from the history of returns via the Kalman filter. Due to learning, the history of beta matters. Even though the conditional CAPM holds, standard OLS tests can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005011650
"When risk-factor loadings are time-varying and unobservable, investors are forced to form beliefs about the levels of their loadings. The learning process involved in forming these beliefs has normative implications for asset-pricing tests. This paper develops an equilibrium model of learning...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002521758
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003900252
We complement the conditional CAPM by introducing unobservable long-run changes in risk factor loadings. In this environment, investors rationally 'learn' the long-level of factor loadings from the observation of realized returns. As a direct consequence of this assumption, conditional betas are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003966158
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003300157
In the first three decades of CRSP data, value stocks have higher betas than growth stocks. Later on, the ranking is reversed and the gap in beta widens. What makes growth strategies nowadays bear more market risk than value strategies? What are the causes of the reversal in the ranking of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003966097
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003300159
In the first three decades of CRSP data, value stocks have higher betas than growth stocks. Later on, the ranking is reversed and the gap in beta widens. What makes growth strategies nowadays bear more market risk than value strategies? What are the causes of the reversal in the ranking of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005162950
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015142181
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011783663