Showing 1 - 6 of 6
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001640881
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000925817
Despite the crucial role of the market factor in Fama and French's three-factor model, the market beta has failed to explain the cross-sectional differences in expected returns proxied by the future realized returns of individual stocks. However, current evidence does not necessarily reject the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012968577
This paper reconciles the conflicting evidence on the cross-sectional pricing of idiosyncratic risk. Some studies find a negative relation, while others document a positive relation between idiosyncratic volatilities and future returns on individual stocks. In contrast to the common practice of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013146900
This paper investigates whether beta can predict the expected return after controlling for the beta instability resulting from shift in the covariance structure. Such a shift is primarily due to noise investors chasing stocks with high idiosyncratic volatility. Consequently, these stocks tend to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013091367
In this paper we show that the failure of the CAPM beta to predict individual stocks' expected returns documented by Fama and French (1992) is largely driven by a small group of stocks with large betas and high idiosyncratic volatilities. These stocks' betas tend to reverse. Therefore, even when...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013057128