This note completes the main result of [Zimper A., (2010) Re-examining the law of iterated expectations for Choquet decision makers. Theory and decision, DOI 10.1007/s11238-010-9221-8], by showing that additional conditions are needed in order the law of iterated expectations to hold true for...

We give an axiomatic foundation to the updating rule proposed by [Sarin, R. and Wakker, P. P. (1998). Revealed likelihood and knightian uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 16(3):223-250.] for CEU preferences. This rule is dynam- ically consistent but non-consequentialist, since forgone...

This note completes the main result of [Zimper A., (2010) Re-examining the law of iterated expectations for Choquet decision makers. Theory and decision, DOI 10.1007/s11238-010-9221-8], by showing that additional conditions are needed in order the law of iterated expectations to hold true for...

We give an axiomatic foundation to the updating rule proposed by [Sarin, R. and Wakker, P. P. (1998). Revealed likelihood and knightian uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 16(3):223-250.] for CEU preferences. This rule is dynamically consistent but non-consequentialist, since forgone...

This note completes the main result of Zimper (Theory and decision, doi:<ExternalRef> <RefSource>10.1007/s11238-010-9221-8</RefSource> <RefTarget Address="10.1007/s11238-010-9221-8" TargetType="DOI"/> </ExternalRef>, <CitationRef CitationID="CR7">2010</CitationRef>), by showing that additional conditions are needed in order the law of iterated expectations to hold true for Choquet decision makers. Due to the comonotonic additivity of Choquet...</citationref></refsource></externalref>

Several updating rules for Choquet capacities have been proposed in the literature. We propose to study them in a general framework consisting of extending the definition of conditional expectations to the Choquet case. Then we adopt several relations between unconditional and conditional...