Showing 1 - 10 of 19
This paper argues that firms may not issue debt in order to avoid the adverse selection cost of debt. Theory suggests that since debt is a concave claim, it may be mispriced when outside investors are uninformed about firms' risk. The empirical literature has however paid little attention the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012713488
The paper presents a simple model arguing that the pecking order theory is an extreme when there is only asymmetric information about value. We show how asymmetric information about both, value and risk, transforms the adverse selection logic underlying the pecking order into a general theory of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012768565
The paper presents a simple model arguing that the pecking order theory is an extreme when there is only asymmetric information about value. We show how asymmetric information about both, value and risk, transforms the adverse selection logic underlying the pecking order into a general theory of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012768917
The paper shows that mispriced deposit insurance and capital regulation were of second order importance in determining the capital structure of large U.S. and European banks during 1991 to 2004. Instead, standard cross-sectional determinants of non-financial firms' leverage carry over to banks,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013156092
We use a natural experiment in the form of 121 staggered changes in corporate income tax rates across U.S. states to show that tax considerations are a first-order determinant of firms' capital structure choices. Over the period 1990-2011, firms increase long-term leverage by 104 basis points on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013090550
Using staggered corporate income tax changes across U.S. states, we show that taxes have a first-order effect on capital structure. Firms increase leverage by around 40 basis points for every percentage-point tax increase. Consistent with dynamic tradeoff theory, the effect is asymmetric:...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013062968
This paper examines the implications of leverage for corporate risk taking in a dynamic N-period model. In each period, there is an identical, standard risk-shifting problem. Leverage creates two inefficiencies. First, we confirm the standard intuition by which high leverage leads firms to take...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014235803
The paper shows that mispriced deposit insurance and capital regulation were of second order importance in determining the capital structure of large U.S. and European banks during 1991 to 2004. Instead, standard cross-sectional determinants of non-financial firms' leverage carry over to banks,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003963775