Showing 1 - 10 of 21
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010200544
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009714790
We use agency theory to investigate the influence of CEO dominance on variation in capital structure. Due to agency conflicts, managers may not always adopt leverage choices that maximize shareholders’ value. Consistent with the prediction of agency theory, the evidence reveals that, when the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010863608
We use agency theory to investigate the influence of CEO dominance on variation in capital structure. Due to agency conflicts, managers may not always adopt leverage choices that maximize shareholders' value. Consistent with the prediction of agency theory, the evidence reveals that, when the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013127772
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003660136
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014451480
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009618679
Grounded in agency theory, this study explores how capital structure is influenced by aggregate corporate governance quality. We employ broad-based governance measures that encompass multiple factors, including boards, audit quality, charter/bylaws, director quality, executive compensation,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014176937
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010414798
Motivated by agency theory, we explore how powerful CEOs view leverage. Due to the agency conflict, CEOs may adopt sub-optimal leverage levels that promote their own private benefits at the expense of shareholders. Using Bebchuk, Cremers, and Peyer's (2011) CEO pay slice (CPS) to gauge CEO...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013061799