Showing 1 - 10 of 11
In this paper we examine the claim that natural resources invite civil conflict, and challenge the main stylized facts in this literature. We find that the nature of causation between resource dependence and civil war is opposite to conventional wisdom. In particular, (i) civil war creates...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014221042
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003889730
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009568906
In this paper we examine the claim that natural resources invite civil conflict, and challenge the main stylized facts in this literature. We find that the nature of causation between resource dependence and civil war is opposite to conventional wisdom. In particular, (i) civil war creates...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003761376
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003846279
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003846283
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011747198
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012311765
We empirically investigate the role of natural resources, and bad governance in explaining variation in the intensity of conflict during the 1991-2002 civil war in Sierra Leone. As a proxy for governance quality we exploit exogenous variation in political competition at the level of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012843923
In this paper we examine the claim that natural resources invite civil conflict, and challenge the main stylized facts in this literature. We find that the conventional measure of resource dependence is endogenous with respect to conflict, and that instrumenting for dependence implies that it is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013095625