Showing 1 - 6 of 6
The present paper analyzes the impact of a climate coalition's border carbon adjustment on emissions from commodity production, welfare and the coalition size. The coalition implements border carbon adjustment to reduce carbon leakage and to improve its terms of trade, while the fringe abstains...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012425940
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015078815
Consider a dynamic model with two countries or coalitions that consume and trade fossil fuel. A non-abating country owns the entire fuel stock and is not concerned about climate change, represented by a ceiling on the carbon dioxide concentration. The government of the other country implements...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011821305
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013347705
This paper compares the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement in the dynamic game of Battaglini and Harstad (2016). The symmetric Nash bargaining solution reflects the Kyoto Protocol, whereas in the Paris Agreement coalition countries maximize a country-specific asymmetric Nash product. In the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014244270
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015071352