Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Lemoine and Rudik (2017) argue that it is efficient to delay reducing carbon emissions, because there is substantial inertia in the climate system. However, this conclusion rests upon misunderstanding the relevant climate physics: there is no substantial lag between CO2 emissions and warming,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012892116
Lemoine and Rudik (2017) argue that it is efficient to delay reducing carbon emissions, because there is substantial inertia in the climate system. However, this conclusion rests upon misunderstanding the relevant climate physics: there is no substantial lag between CO2 emissions and warming,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011951673
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012198365
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012216104
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012216106
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012309924
The optimal transition to a low-carbon economy must account for adjustment costs in switching from dirty to clean capital, technological progress, and economic and climatic shocks. We study the low-carbon transition using a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with emissions abatement...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013472310
The optimal transition to a low-carbon economy must account for adjustment costs in switching from dirty to clean capital, technological progress, and economic and climatic shocks. We study the low-carbon transition using a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model with emissions abatement...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014264872
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014282745
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013502518