Showing 1 - 10 of 18
For quite some time long-only index funds have been suspected of being responsible for price increases in agricultural futures markets. This suspicion has prompted demands to drastically limit long-only index fundsʼ scope of activity. Such demands and their underlying diagnoses, however,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013060167
For quite some time long-only index funds have been suspected of being responsible for price increases in agricultural futures markets. This suspicion has prompted demands to drastically limit long-only index funds' scope of activity. Such demands and their underlying diagnoses, however,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010388689
This article sketches an ethics of (financial) speculation in futures markets. (1) It identifies an intentionalistic fallacy prevalent in moral criticisms of speculation in general and of financial speculation in particular. (2) It scrutinizes the degree to which the recent debate on financial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013074935
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010200560
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010200569
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010200578
For a considerable time, long-only index funds have been suspected of being responsible for price increases on agricultural futures markets, particularly those for grain. Utilizing partial equilibrium concepts, we analyze the market impacts of long-only index funds. Our analysis reveals that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010355849
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009733628
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011414713
This article sketches an ethics of (financial) speculation in futures markets. (1) It identi-fies an intentionalistic fallacy prevalent in moral criticisms of speculation in general and of financial speculation in particular. (2) It scrutinizes the degree to which the recent debate on financial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011758953