Showing 1 - 10 of 28
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011659739
In an experiment, we studied how small groups tackle a company takeover game, a task where participants deciding in isolation frequently exhibit the winner’s curse. We found that groups of three members, who could exchange opinions and chat, substantially reduced the winner's curse and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010614157
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003923665
Within-group communication in competitive coordination games has been shown to increase competition between groups and lower efficiency. This study further explores potentially harmful effects of communication, by addressing the questions of (i) asymmetric communication and (ii) the endogenous...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012970700
Charness and Dufwenberg (American Economic Review, June 2011, 1211-1237) have recently demonstrated that cheap-talk communication raises efficiency in bilateral contracting situations with adverse selection. We replicate their finding and check its robustness by introducing competition between...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013106477
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003923667
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003923694
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003923721
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009783271
Charness and Dufwenberg (American Economic Review, June 2011, 1211-1237) have recently demonstrated that cheap-talk communication raises efficiency in bilateral contracting situations with adverse selection. We replicate their finding and check its robustness by introducing competition between...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009742591