Showing 1 - 10 of 16
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001431782
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001462058
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000682824
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000997378
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001376729
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001559081
Anecdotal evidence suggests that uncontrolled managers let wages rise above competitive levels. To test this belief, we examine the wage impact of antitakeover legislation passed throughout the 1980s in many states. Since many view hostile takeovers as an important disciplining device, these...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014044946
Anecdotal evidence suggests that uncontrolled managers let wages rise above competitive levels. Testing this popular perception has proven difficult; however, because independent variation in the extent of managerial discretion is needed. In this paper, we use states? passage of anti-takeover...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014027834
Anecdotal evidence suggests that uncontrolled managers let wages rise above competitive levels. Testing this popular perception has proven difficult, however, because independent variation in the extent of managerial discretion is needed. In this paper, we use states' passage of anti-takeover...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013137228
We empirically examine two competing views of CEO pay. In the contracting view, pay is used to solve an agency problem: the compensation committee optimally chooses pay contracts which give the CEO incentives to maximize shareholder wealth. In the skimming view, pay is the result of an agency...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012783957