Showing 1 - 10 of 18
This paper investigates optimal contest design when the designer's payoff is increasing in competitive balance between contestants. A two-player contest with asymmetric effort costs (asymmetric abilities) is considered. Competitive balance is measured by the difference in winning probabilities...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001784223
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003677761
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003380091
This paper investigates optimal contest design when the designer s payoff is increasing in competitive balance between contestants. A two-player contest with asymmetric effort costs (asymmetric abilities) is considered. Competitive balance is measured by the difference in winning probabilities...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011509371
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009312104
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013176737
This paper studies sabotage in a contest with non-identical players. Unlike previous papers, we consider sabotage in an elimination contest and allow contestants to sabotage a potential or future rival. It turns out that for a certain partition of players there is a pure-strategy equilibrium in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003112626
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003895047
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009308863
This paper provides an economic explanation of the frequent rule changes in the Formula One (F1) motor racing series. In a two-stage model, the FIA (as the organizer of the F1) first decides whether to change the rules or not, and then the racing teams compete in a contest. It turns out that a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010464322