Similar Search Results

Competition policy towards vertical restraints in Europe and the United States

Comanor, William S. - In: Empirica : journal of european economics 24 (1997) 1, pp. 37-52

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001232001

Market power or efficiency : a review of antitrust standards

Comanor, William S. - In: Review of industrial organization : RIO 7 (1992) 2, pp. 105-116

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001137397

The competitive effects of vertical agrreements : reply

Comanor, William S. - In: The American economic review 77 (1987) 5, pp. 1069-1072

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001037526

Economics and the antitrust division : papers from a seminar honoring the 25th Anniversary of the creation of the Economic Policy Office, Economic Analysis Group ; special issue

Comanor, William S. (contributor) - 2000

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001561747

The two economics of vertical restraints

Comanor, William S. - In: Review of industrial organization : RIO 5 (1990) 2

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001277331

Steiner's two-stage vision : implications for antitrust analysis

Comanor, William S. - In: The antitrust bulletin : the journal of American and … 49 (2004) 4, pp. 999-1012

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002675966

Rewriting history : the early Sherman Act monopolization cases

Comanor, William S.; Scherer, Frederic M. - In: Competition policy, domestic and international, (pp. 297-323). 2000

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003047283

Vertical mergers and market foreclosure

Comanor, William S.; Rey, Patrick - 2004

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002383336

Economic rationality and the Areeda-Turner rule

Comanor, William S.; Frech, H. E. - In: Review of industrial organization : RIO 46 (2015) 3, pp. 253-268

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011349423

Vertical Antitrust Policy as a Problem of Inference : The Response of the American Antitrust Institute

Scherer, Frederic M. - 2008

This paper offers a critique of a recent paper on vertical restraints by four Federal Trade Commission staff members. The FTC staff based much of their analysis on a survey of 22 previously published case studies. We argue that the sample of 22 is biased toward cases in which vertical restraints...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012725193