Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001200802
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000147403
This paper shows that up-front payments can play a crucial role in providing efficient investment incentives when contracts are incomplete. They can eliminate the overinvestment effect identified by Rogerson [1984] and Shavell [1980] when courts use an expectation damage remedy. This method...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012473989
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012131356
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001209499
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001520185
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000633184
Contract law's liquidated damage rules prevent enforcement of contractual damage measures that require the promisor, if it breaches, to transfer to the promisee a sum that exceeds the net gain the promisee expected to make from performance; but these rules permit the promisor to transfer less than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014101479
This paper shows that up-front payments can play a crucial role in providing efficient investment incentives when contracts are incomplete. They can eliminate the overinvestment effect identified by Rogerson [1984] and Shavell [1980] when courts use an expectation damage remedy. This method...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013224687
This paper studies the ability of an agent and a principal to achieve the first-best outcome when the agent invests in an asset that has greater value if owned by the principal than by the agent. When contracts can be renegotiated, a well-known danger is that the principal can hold up the agent,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012472728