Showing 1 - 10 of 17
This paper provides a quantitative analysis of power relations and strategic investment in the transport system for Russian gas. First, we analyse how the architecture of the transport system determines Russia’s bargaining power vis-à-vis (potential) transit countries. By applying the Shapley...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011497648
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003513704
We develop a dynamic model of strategic investment in a transnational pipeline system. In the absence of international contract enforcement, countries may distort investment in order to increase their bargaining power, resulting in overinvestment in expensive and underinvestment in cheap...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010271079
This paper provides a quantitative analysis of power relations and strategic investment in the transport system for Russian gas. First, we analyse how the architecture of the transport system determines Russia's bargaining power vis-à-vis (potential) transit countries. By applying the Shapley...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010273372
We use cooperative game theory to analyze the strategic impact of three controversial pipeline projects. Two of them, Nord Stream and South Stream, allow Russian gas to bypass transit countries, Ukraine and Belarus. Nord Stream's strategic value turns out to be huge, justifying the high...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011374346
Existing cooperative game theoretic studies of bargaining power in gas pipeline systems are based on the so called characteristic function form (CFF). This approach is potentially misleading if some pipelines fall under regulated third party access (TPA). TPA, which is by now the norm in the EU,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012016390
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011628946
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011309249
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011309675
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012173639