Showing 1 - 10 of 15
We argue that the CAPM may be a reasonable model for estimating the cost of capital for projects in spite of increasing empirical evidence in the literature against the CAPM based on stock returns. As McDonald and Siegel (1985) and Berk, Green and Naik (1999) point out, stocks are backed by...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013146788
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009492585
We argue that the empirical evidence against the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) based on stock returns does not invalidate its use for estimating the cost of capital for projects in making capital budgeting decisions. Since stocks are backed not only by projects in place, but also the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012757537
We argue that the empirical evidence against the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) based on stock returns does not invalidate its use for estimating the cost of capital for projects in making capital budgeting decisions. Because stocks are backed not only by projects in place, but also by the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010702354
We argue that the empirical evidence against the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) based on stock returns does not invalidate its use for estimating the cost of capital for projects in making capital budgeting decisions. Since stocks are backed not only by projects in place, but also the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012463759
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001640536
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002527282
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011908082
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011590104
To create value, a firm must invest in projects that provide a return greater than the cost of capital. The cost of capital is not observed and its estimation requires assumptions on investors' consumption, savings, and portfolio decisions. We review the academic literature on firms' cost of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012931092