Showing 1 - 10 of 399
An assessment of the welfare gains from a targeted social program can be seriously biased unless it takes proper account of the endogeneity of program participation. Bias comes from two sources of placement endogeneity: the purposive targeting of the geographic areas to receive the program, and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005115764
The central governments of many developing countries have chosen to decentralize their anti-poverty programs, in the expectation that local agents are better informed about local needs. The paper shows that this potential advantage of decentralized eligibility criteria can come at a large cost,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010521606
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015160287
This article shows that, using a poverty map and the corresponding spending allocation across geographic areas, one can identify the latent differences in mean program grants to the poor and the nonpoor. An application to an antipoverty program in Argentina is used to assess the program's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015160469
Evidence on the implementation of India's National Rural Employment Guarantee Act suggests that the available work is often rationed by local leaders in poor areas, and that this is an important factor limiting the scheme's impact on poverty. The paper offers explanations for this empirical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012479639
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001370827
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010524755
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003617620
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001482872
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000991093