Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011793464
A decision maker (DM) makes choices from different sets of alternatives. The DM is initially fully ignorant of the payoff associated to each alternative, and learns these payoffs only after a large number of choices have been made. We show that, in the presence of an outside option once payoffs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013015438
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013473408
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014248432
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015123315
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012138039
We design and implement lab experiments, as close as possible to the Ellsberg two-color urn experiment, to evaluate the positive and normative appeal of behavior arising from models of ambiguity-averse preferences. We report three main empirical findings: First, these preference models do not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012848203
A decision maker (DM) is asked to make choices from a set of acts, which entail both risk and uncertainty in the sense of knight (1921). Extending Raiffa's (1961) argument I show that, provided the DM can choose acts objectively randomly (by flipping her own fair coin, for instance), provided...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013101803
Suppose a decision maker (DM), in the language of Anscombe and Aumann (1963), has preferences over acts (horse-race lotteries) that satisfy the von Neumann and Morgenstern (1944) axioms for objective lotteries (constant acts) and Anscombe and Aumann's (1963) Axioms of Reversal of Order and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014039174