Showing 1 - 10 of 26
In this paper we extend the results on ex-ante agreeable trade of Kajii and Ui [Kajii, A., Ui, T., 2006. Agreeable bets with multiple priors. Journal of Economic Theory 128, 299–305] to the case of non-convex Choquet preferences. We discuss the economic relevance of the main result for the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011072959
In [7] Ghirardato, Macheroni and Marinacci (GMM) propose a method for distinguishing between perceived ambiguity and the decision-maker's reaction to it. They study a general class of preferences which they refer to as invariant biseparable. This class includes CEU and MEU. They axiomatize a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003897443
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010357257
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011529361
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009718812
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012624521
We characterize prior-by-prior Bayesian updating using a model proposed by Gilboa, Maccheroni, Marinacci and Schmeidler (2010) that jointly considers objective and subjective rationality. These rationality concepts are subject to the Bewley unanimity rule and maxmin expected utility,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012020227
In this paper, we propose an interpretation of the Hilbert space method used in quantum theory in the context of decision making under uncertainty. For a clear comparison we will stay as close as possible to the framework of SEU suggested by Savage (1954). We will use the Ellsberg (1961) paradox...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011853162
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001421815
In this paper, we propose an interpretation of the Hilbert space method used in quantum theory in the context of decision making under uncertainty. For a clear comparison we will stay as close as possible to the framework of SEU suggested by Savage (1954). We will use the Ellsberg (1961) paradox...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011745366