Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011793464
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009312204
In this paper, we use experimental economics methods to test how well Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) fares as a choice support system in a real decision problem. AHP provides a ranking that we statistically compare with three additional rankings given by the subjects in the experiment: one at...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014044900
A decision maker (DM) makes choices from different sets of alternatives. The DM is initially fully ignorant of the payoff associated to each alternative, and learns these payoffs only after a large number of choices have been made. We show that, in the presence of an outside option once payoffs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013015438
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013473408
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014248432
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015123315
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012138039
We design and implement lab experiments, as close as possible to the Ellsberg two-color urn experiment, to evaluate the positive and normative appeal of behavior arising from models of ambiguity-averse preferences. We report three main empirical findings: First, these preference models do not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012848203
A decision maker (DM) is asked to make choices from a set of acts, which entail both risk and uncertainty in the sense of knight (1921). Extending Raiffa's (1961) argument I show that, provided the DM can choose acts objectively randomly (by flipping her own fair coin, for instance), provided...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013101803