Showing 1 - 10 of 18
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009375410
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009703229
We confront a representative sample of one 1,102 Dutch individuals with a series of incentivized investment decisions and also elicit their time preferences. There are two treatments that differ in the frequency at which individuals decide about the invested amount. The low frequency treatment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009681527
We elicit time preferences of a representative sample of 1,102 Dutch individuals and also confront them with a series of incentivized investment decisions. There are two treatments which differ by the frequency at which individuals decide about the invested amount. The low frequency treatment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013119938
We confront a representative sample of one 1,102 Dutch individuals with a series of incentivized investment decisions and also elicit their time preferences. There are two treatments that differ in the frequency at which individuals decide about the invested amount. The low frequency treatment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013089008
We document outcome bias in situations where an agent makes risky financial decisions for a principal. In three experiments, we show that the principal’s evaluations and financial rewards for the agent are strongly affected by the random outcome of the risky investment. This happens despite...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014503948
We study the role of accountability in situations where an agent makes risky decisions for a principal. We observe that in the absence of accountability, agents choose less risk averse investments for the principal than investors who invest for their own account. Accountability mitigates the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041752
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009744765
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010401213
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010431604