Showing 1 - 10 of 16
A large body of experimental research has demonstrated that, on average, people violate the axioms of expected utility theory as well as of discounted utility theory. In particular, aggregate behavior is best characterized by probability distortions and hyperbolic discounting. But is it the same...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013137702
How does risk tolerance vary with stake size? This important question cannot be adequately answered if framing effects, nonlinear probability weighting, and heterogeneity of preference types are neglected. We show that, contrary to gains, no coherent change in relative risk aversion is observed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003892446
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003992842
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008989101
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009425917
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003873796
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011943076
When valuing risky prospects, people typically overweight small probabilities and underweight medium and large probabilities, but there is vast heterogeneity in individual behavior. We explore the relationship between person-specific probability weights, estimated from investment decisions in a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003352587
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012299909
This study compares the performance of Prospect Theory versus Stochastic Expected Utility Theory at fitting data on decision making under risk. Both theories incorporate well-known deviations from Expected Utility Maximization such as the Allais paradox or the fourfold pattern of risk attitudes....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003894019