Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001722136
We argue that people intuitively distinguish epistemic (knowable) uncertainty from aleatory (random) uncertainty and show that the relative salience of these dimensions is reflected in natural language use. We hypothesize that confidence statements (e.g., “I am fairly confident,” “I am 90%...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013227998
People view uncertain events as knowable in principle (epistemic uncertainty), as fundamentally random (aleatory uncertainty), or as some mixture of the two. We show that people make more extreme probability judgments (i.e., closer to 0 or 1) for events they view as entailing more epistemic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013228101
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009565397
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011647370
In nine studies, we find that investors intuitively distinguish two independent dimensions of uncertainty: epistemic uncertainty that they attribute to missing knowledge, skill, or information, versus aleatory uncertainty that they attribute to chance or stochastic processes. Investors who view...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012822885
The way a choice is presented influences what a decision-maker chooses.This paper outlines the tools available to choice architects, that is anyone who present people with choices. We divide these tools into two categories: those used in structuring the choice task and those used in describing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014156962
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014305437
Most decisions in life are gambles. Should I speed up or slow down as I approach the yellow traffic light ahead? Should I invest in the stock market or in treasury bills? Should I undergo surgery or radiation therapy to treat my tumor? From mundane choices rendered with scarcely a moment's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014055135
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001430692