Showing 1 - 10 of 12
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012544322
This paper contributes to the literature on private law enforcement by proposing a novel solution to the problem of underenforcement by monopolistic enforcers. Monopolistic enforcers underinvest in enforcement because they ignore the social benefits of deterrence. We show that this problem can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011048207
Marginal deterrence concerns the incentives created by criminal penalties for offenders to refrain from committing more harmful acts. We show that when offenders act sequentially, it is often optimal for the level of the sanction, not just the expected sanction, to rise with the severity of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010930727
Previous literature on frivolous lawsuits has focused on litigation costs and the optimal settlement-trial decision of defendants, but has not examined how they affect deterrence. This paper considers whether there are circumstances under which frivolous suits might actually increase deterrence,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011039756
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013282600
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010516033
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010495086
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011574642
The standard economic model of crime since Becker (1968) is primarily concerned with deterrence. Actual punishment policies, however, appear to rely on imprisonment to a greater extent than is prescribed by that model. One reason may be the incapacitation function of prison. The model developed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005059246
The standard economic model of crime focuses on the goal of deterrence, but actual punishment schemes, most notably recent three-strikes laws, seem to rely more on imprisonment than is prescribed by that model. One explanation is that prison also serves an incapacitation function. The current...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005019473