Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000878052
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010354955
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010424267
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009423506
We briefly review and discuss traditional conjoint analysis (CA) and discrete choice experiments (DCEs), widely used stated preference elicitation methods in several disciplines. We pay particular attention to the origins and basis of CA, and show that it is generally inconsistent with economic...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011367233
Disagreement among researchers regarding types of optimal choice experiments is often best seen as resulting from differences in the set of assumptions researchers are willing to make about the underlying data generating process. Much of the current debate may have confused, rather than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011367235
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011765011
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012285688
Science funding agencies such as the NIH, NSF, and their counterparts around the world are often criticized for being too conservative, funding incremental innovations over more radical but riskier projects. One explanation for their conservatism is the way the agencies use peer review of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014322796
Recent Monte Carlo work on choosing experimental designs for discrete choice experiments seemed to greatly simplify this choice for applied researchers. It suggested that (a) commonly used designs can generate unbiased estimates for indirect utility function specifications with main effects only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014203336