Showing 1 - 10 of 16
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009726199
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011627819
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011799092
A large concern in U.S. opioid policy is whether supply side controls are effective at reducing the quantity of opioids prescribed, without harmful substitution. An unstudied way that policy targeted a major opioid through the federal Controlled Substance Act (CSA) was the August 2014 scheduling...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012826652
Prior work considers effects of prescribing restrictions on opioid use but not upstream implications for pharmaceutical marketing activities, despite the inordinate role many believe marketing played in the crisis. Our study proposes a stylized model of pharmaceutical payments and investigates...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012861727
Prior work considers effects of prescribing restrictions on opioid use but not upstream implications for pharmaceutical marketing activities, despite the inordinate role many believe marketing played in the crisis. Our study proposes a stylized model of pharmaceutical payments and investigates...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012480300
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012264020
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012395684
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012129222
A large concern in U.S. opioid policy is whether supply side controls are effective at reducing the quantity of opioids prescribed, without harmful substitution. An unstudied way that policy targeted a major opioid through the federal Controlled Substance Act (CSA) was the August 2014 scheduling...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012481375