Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Under the doctrine of vicarious liability, a deep-pocket principal is often held responsible for a third-party harm caused by a judgment-proof agent's negligence. We analyze the incentive contract used by the principal to control the agent's behavior when a court can make an error in determining...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014059019
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003786463
A potentially dangerous product is supplied by a competitive market. The likelihood of a product-related accident depends on the unobservable precautions taken by the manufacturer and on the type of the consumer. Contracts include the price to be paid by the consumer ex ante and stipulated...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013038569
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010533172
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012620134
When firms collude and charge supra-competitive prices, consumers can bring antitrust lawsuits against the firms. When the litigation cost is low, firms accept the cost as just another cost of doing business, whereas when the cost is high, the firms lower the price to deter litigation. Class...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012120107
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012427118
The paper reconsiders an old question in law and economics: will firms prefer to rely on legal sanctions or market sanctions as a means of committing to provide high quality goods? In the model, legal sanctions are expensive to deploy because of litigation costs, whereas market sanctions are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012938589
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014228653
Professors Polinsky and Che advocate decoupling what plaintiffs recover from what defendants pay in damages, specifically arguing that lowering recovery and raising damages (by appropriate amounts) delivers the same level of primary activity deterrence with fewer filed suits. Professors Kahan...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014119244