Showing 1 - 5 of 5
Prior to the Great Depression, regulators imposed double liability on bank shareholders to ensure financial stability and protect depositors. Under double liability, shareholders of failing banks lost their initial investment and had to pay up to the par value of the stock in order to compensate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012909243
Prior to the Great Depression, regulators imposed double liability on bank shareholders to ensure financial stability and protect depositors. Under double liability, shareholders of failing banks lost their initial investment and had to pay up to the par value of the stock in order to compensate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012909468
Prior to the Great Depression, regulators imposed double liability on bank shareholders to ensure financial stability and protect depositors. Under double liability, shareholders of failing banks lost their initial investment and had to pay up to the par value of the stock in order to compensate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012909608
Prior to the Great Depression, regulators imposed double liability on bank shareholders to ensure financial stability and protect depositors. Under double liability, shareholders of failing banks lost their initial investment and had to pay up to the par value of the stock in order to compensate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011926198
Do corporate social responsibility (CSR) metrics accurately reflect firms’ material social impacts? Analyzing small business lending during the Great Recession, we find that banks assessed to be socially responsible exerted higher social costs by actively pulling back funds from those in need...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014238965