Showing 1 - 10 of 25
Consistent with neoclassical models with investment lags, we find that a bottom-up measure of aggregate investment plans, namely, aggregate expected investment growth, negatively predicts future stock market returns. with an adjusted in-sample R2 of 18.5% and an out-of-sample R2 of 16.3% at the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012917305
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008651319
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010224741
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009539860
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003803805
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003834439
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011317297
Consistent with neoclassical models with investment lags, we find that a bottom-up measure of aggregate investment plans, namely, aggregate expected investment growth, negatively predicts future stock market returns. with an adjusted in-sample R2 of 18.5% and an out-of-sample R2 of 16.3% at the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011797275
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013410898
A bottom-up measure of aggregate investment plans, namely, aggregate expected investment growth (AEIG) can negatively predict market returns. At the one-year horizon, the adjusted in-sample R-square is 18.2% and the out-of-sample R-square is 14.4%. The return predictive power is robust after...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012854283