Showing 1 - 10 of 23
Socioeconomic segregation is often decried for denying poorer children the benefits of positive 'peer effects'. Yet standard, linear-in-means models of peer effects (a) implicitly assume that segregation is zero sum, with gains and losses to rich and poor perfectly offsetting, and (b) rule out...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011395007
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010218269
This paper proposes two related measures of educational inequality: one for educational achievement and another for educational opportunity. The former is the simple variance (or standard deviation) of test scores. Its selection is informed by consideration of two measurement issues that have...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011395160
Socioeconomic segregation is often decried for denying poorer children the benefits of positive' peer effects'. Yet standard, linear-in-means models of peer effects (a) implicitly assume that segregation is zero sum, with gains and losses to rich and poor perfectly offsetting, and (b) rule out...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012975909
Socioeconomic segregation is often decried for denying poorer children the benefits of positive 'peer effects'. Yet standard, linear-in-means models of peer effects (a) implicitly assume that segregation is zero sum, with gains and losses to rich and poor perfectly offsetting, and (b) rule out...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012551214
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001598829
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001609353
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001611878
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001669757
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001964626