Showing 1 - 10 of 28
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009724744
The European Commission did not publish a cost-benefit analysis for its 2020 climate package. This paper fills that gap, comparing the marginal costs and benefits of greenhouse gas emission reduction. The uncertainty about the marginal costs of climate change is large and skewed, and estimates...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008905742
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003363149
The current EU proposal on greenhouse gas emission reduction has 28 targets for 2020: an EU-wide one for carbon dioxide emissions covered by the European Trading System, and one target for non-ETS emission per Member State. Implementation is necessarily more expensive than needed. I consider...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003770244
The EU has proposed four flexibility mechanisms for the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions in the period 2013-2020: (1) the Emissions Trade Scheme (ETS), a permit market between selected companies; (2) trade in non-ETS allotments between Member States; (3) the Clean Development Mechanism...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003828267
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011960545
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015119678
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001691257
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003107466
Free-riding is a major problem for international climate policy. A country can take advantage of other countries' emission reduction without contributing to abatement policies itself. Game theory suggests that issue linkage may help to overcome free-riding. Earlier studies suggest that if...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014155764