Similar Search Results

Uncertainty aversion and dynamic consistency

Eichberger, Jürgen; Kelsey, David - 1995 - Rev.

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000913814

Uncertainty aversion and preference for randomisation

Eichberger, Jürgen; Kelsey, David - 1995

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000919265

Uncertainty aversion and dynamic consistency

Eichberger, Jürgen - In: International economic review 37 (1996) 3, pp. 625-640

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001204267

Uncertainty aversion and preference for randomisation

Eichberger, Jürgen - In: Journal of economic theory 71 (1996) 1, pp. 31-43

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001209442

Uncertainty aversion and dynamic consistency

Eichberger, Jürgen; Kelsey, David - 1994

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000884593

Uncertainty aversion and preference for randomisation

Eichberger, Jürgen; Kelsey, David - 1995

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013442449

E-capacities and the Ellsberg paradox

Eichberger, Jürgen - 1996

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013442474

Risk and risk aversion for state-dependent utility

Kelsey, David - In: Theory and decision : an international journal for … 33 (1992) 1, pp. 71-82

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001127394

Maxmin expected utility and weight of evidence

Kelsey, David - 1990

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000129171

How mindless is standard economics really?

Schipper, Burkhard - 2009

Contrary to claims by Gul and Pesendorfer (2008), I show that standard economics makes use of non-choice evidence in a meaningful way. This is because standard economics solely grounded in the theory of choice is "incomplete". That is, it has content that can not be revealed with any general...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003894920