Similar Search Results

Voice effects on attitudes towards an impartial decision maker : experimental evidence

Kleine, Marco; Langenbach, Pascal; Zhurakhovska, Lilia - 2013

The opportunity to voice one's opinion about a decision is a fundamental aspect of procedural fairness and applies to a …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009771811

Fairness and Persuasion. How Stakeholder Communication Affects Impartial Decision Making

Kleine, Marco; Langenbach, Pascal; Zhurakhovska, Lilia - 2014

We study experimentally whether and to what extent impartial decision makers are influenced by stakeholders’ fairness … opinions in an allocation decision. The setting allows for different focal fairness rules to be considered. We compare … communication treatments, in which one of the stakeholders states his or her opinion prior to the allocation decision, to a baseline …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014147415

Fairness and persuasion : how stakeholder communication affects impartial decision making

Kleine, Marco; Langenbach, Pascal; Zhurakhovska, Lilia - In: Essays in experimental law and economics : …, (pp. 39-59). 2017

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011719140

How voice shapes reactions to impartial decision makers : an experiment

Kleine, Marco; Langenbach, Pascal; Zhurakhovska, Lilia - 2013 - revised version February 2014

We study how participation in decision processes shapes people's behavior towards impartial authorities. In an incentivized laboratory experiment, an impartial decision maker at first decides about the allocation of money between two subordinates. Treatments differ in the opportunity for one...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010258889

How Voice Shapes Reactions to Impartial Decision-Makers : An Experiment on Participation Procedures

Kleine, Marco; Langenbach, Pascal; Zhurakhovska, Lilia - 2017

This paper studies how participation in decision procedures affects people’s reactions to the deciding authority. In our economic experiment, having voice, i.e., the opportunity to state one’s opinion prior to a decision, significantly increases subordinates’ subsequent kindness towards...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014155183

Dishonesty and risk-taking : compliance decisions of individuals and groups

Fochmann, Martin; Kocher, Martin; Müller, Nadja; Wolf, … - 2019

the group communication process when deciding on compliance. …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012105157

Are Team Members Less Inequality Averse than Individual Decision Makers?

He, Haoran - 2015

We compare inequality aversion in individuals and teams by means of both within- and between-subject experimental designs, and we investigate how teams aggregate individual preferences. We find that team decisions reveal less inequality aversion than individual initial proposals in team...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013033505

Are Group Members Less Inequality Averse Than Individual Decision Makers?

He, Haoran - 2016

Do groups exhibit more or less inequality aversion than individuals? Although the previous literature has shown that in many environments individuals in groups make more selfish decisions than when deciding in isolation, we find that individuals express more inequality aversion when making...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012977611

Guilt in voting and public good games

Rothenhäusler, Dominik; Schweizer, Nikolaus; Szech, Nora - 2016

This paper analyzes how moral costs affect individual support of morally difficult group decisions. We study a threshold public good game with moral costs. Motivated by recent empirical findings, we assume that these costs are heterogeneous and consist of three parts. The first one is a standard...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011567880

Decisions under uncertainty in social contexts

Müller, Stephan; Rau, Holger A. - 2016

This paper theoretically and experimentally studies decision-making in risky and social environments. We explore the interdependence of individual risk attitudes and social preferences in form of inequality aversion as two decisive behavioral determinants in such contexts. Our model and the data...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011540812