Showing 1 - 10 of 13
Estimating risk preferences is tricky because controlling for confounding factors is difficult. Omitting or imperfectly controlling for these factors can attribute too much observable behavior to risk aversion and bias estimated preferences. Agents often modify risky decisions in response to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013125024
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009155280
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008904399
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003845694
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009734026
In this paper, we explore the relationship between dietary diversity and income in pastoralist households in East Africa. Previous estimates of income elasticities of nutrient demand have ranged from zero to unity. However, these estimates are always based on the total income. One possible...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014182083
We proffer a method to assess the adequacy of expected utility theory (EUT) in empirical studies involving discrete and continuous choices. The method calibrates a utility function to revealed choices and rejects EUT for absurd degrees of implied concavity over the wealth at risk. We find EUT...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013147202
A model with proportional errors in variables arising naturally in microeconomics is considered. Unlike the classical additive errors case, all OLS parameter estimates exhibit attenuation bias that does not depend on the limiting distribution of the data. The distribution of OLS estimators is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012610942
A model with proportional errors in variables arising naturally in microeconomics is considered. Unlike the classical additive errors case, all OLS parameter estimates exhibit attenuation bias that does not depend on the limiting distribution of the data. The distribution of OLS estimators is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010684137
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001247432