Showing 1 - 10 of 11
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001090859
The purpose of this paper is to help empirical economists think through when and how to weight the data used in estimation. We start by distinguishing two purposes of estimation: to estimate population descriptive statistics and to estimate causal effects. In the former type of research,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013085910
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009729806
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011305707
Estimators that exploit an instrumental variable to correct for misclassification in a binary regressor typically assume that the misclassification rates are invariant across all values of the instrument. We show that this assumption is invalid in routine empirical settings. We derive a new...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012481100
The purpose of this paper is to help empirical economists think through when and how to weight the data used in estimation. We start by distinguishing two purposes of estimation: to estimate population descriptive statistics and to estimate causal effects. In the former type of research,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012459802
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012301540
Estimators that exploit an instrumental variable to correct for misclassification in a binary regressor typically assume that the misclassification rates are invariant across all values of the instrument. We show that this assumption is invalid in routine empirical settings. We derive a new...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012266298
Estimators that exploit an instrumental variable to correct for misclassification in a binary regressor typically assume that the misclassification rates are invariant across all values of the instrument. We show that this assumption is invalid in routine empirical settings. We derive a new...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012825597
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001334845