Showing 1 - 10 of 48
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011620016
We develop new quasi-experimental tools to measure racial discrimination, due to either racial bias or statistical discrimination, in the context of bail decisions. We show that the omitted variables bias in observational release rate comparisons can be purged by using the quasi-random...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014100227
We develop new quasi-experimental tools to measure disparate impact, regardless of its source, in the context of bail decisions. We show that omitted variables bias in pretrial release rate comparisons can be purged by using the quasi-random assignment of judges to estimate average pretrial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013324529
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011474711
This paper develops a new test for identifying racial bias in the context of bail decisions – a high-stakes setting with large disparities between white and black defendants. We motivate our analysis using Becker's (1957) model of racial bias, which predicts that rates of pre-trial misconduct...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011685451
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011689492
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011669347
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012052030
In this paper, we show that the design and decentralized, school-based scoring of New York's high school exit exams – the Regents Examinations – led to the systematic manipulation of test sores just below important proficiency cutoffs. Our estimates suggest that teachers inflate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012994902
In this paper, we show that the design and decentralized, school-based scoring of New York's high school exit exams - the Regents Examinations - led to the systematic manipulation of test sores just below important proficiency cutoffs. Our estimates suggest that teachers inflate approximately 40...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012456510