Showing 1 - 10 of 11
In the wake of the global financial crisis, attention has often focused on whether incentives generated by bank executives' compensation programs led to excessive risk-taking. Post-crisis, compensation reform proposals have taken broadly three approaches: long-term deferred equity incentive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013058762
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010399468
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009570534
This Article advances an executive compensation reform proposal that is specifically addressed to firms receiving government financial assistance and thought to pose a systemic risk, although we think that all firms should consider its adoption. Executive compensation reform should lead to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013154406
We examine whether boards are sufficiently well-informed to make efficient decisions on CEO compensation. In order to mitigate the endogeneity of board decision on CEO compensation, we use mutual fund flow-driven trading pressure as an exogenous shock to stock price informativeness. Consistent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012970983
Managerial power theory holds that structural flaws in corporate governance, such as board defenses, enable opportunistic managers to extract excessive pay. While this theory has proven highly influential, this Article argues that it fails to answer important questions. For example, how does...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012915043
We examine how boards decide on CEO compensation depending on how informative stock prices are. In order to mitigate the endogeneity of board decisions, we use extreme mutual fund flow-driven trading pressure as an exogenous shock to stock price informativeness. Consistent with informed boards...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012905487
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009308233
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009511552
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010396066