Showing 1 - 10 of 52
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001582169
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003098198
We review an asymmetric auction experiment. Based on Plum (1992) private valuations of the two bidders are independently drawn from distinct but commonly known distributions, one of which stochastically dominating the other. We test the qualitative properties of that model of asymmetric...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014126435
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009377574
This paper reconsiders experimental tests of the English clock auction. We point out why the standard procedure can only use a small subset of all bids, which gives rise to a selection bias. We propose an alternative yet equivalent format that makes all bids visible, and apply it to a 'wallet...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010370528
This paper evaluates how R&D subsidies to the business sector are typically awarded. We identify two sources of ineffciency: the selection based on a ranking of individual projects, rather than complete allocations, and the failure to induce competition among applicants in order to extract and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010366543
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394621
This paper evaluates the typically applied rules for awarding R&D subsidies. We identify two sources of inefficiency: the selection based on a ranking of individual projects, rather than complete allocations, and the failure to induce competition among applicants in order to extract and use...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014061515
We review an asymmetric auction experiment. Based on Plum (1992) private valuations of the two bidders are independently drawn from distinct but commonly known distributions, one of which stochastically dominating the other. We test the qualitative properties of that model of asymmetric...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009612559
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001818307