Showing 1 - 10 of 37
Non-experimental evaluations of programs compare individuals who choose to participate in a program to individuals who do not. Such comparisons run the risk of conflating non-random selection into the program with its causal effects. By randomly assigning individuals to participate in the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011843165
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000934892
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001319714
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001235795
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001249590
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001183913
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001750013
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001755108
"This paper makes three primary contributions. First, we demonstrate the usefulness of general equilibrium models as tools with which to draw policy implications for policies implemented in practice only as small-scale social experiments. Second, we illustrate the usefulness of social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001928148
This paper considers the statistical and economic justification for one widely-used method of adjusting data from social experiments to account for dropping-out behavior due to Bloom (1984). We generalize the method to apply to distributions not just means, and present tests of the key...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013223352