Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009785954
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009755710
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010342711
We address a basic diffculty with incorporating fairness into standard utilitarian choice theories. Standard utilitarian theories evaluate lotteries according to the (weighted) utility over ?nal outcomes and assume in particular that a lottery is never preferred over getting the most preferred...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003909311
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010468635
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003869986
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003716943
Theories can be produced by individuals seeking a good reputation of knowledge. Hence, a significant question is how to test theories anticipating that they might have been produced by (potentially uninformed) experts who prefer their theories not to be rejected. If a theory that predicts...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003780903
Theories can be produced by experts seeking a reputation for having knowledge. Hence, a tester could anticipate that theories may have been strategically produced by uninformed experts who want to pass an empirical test. We show that, with no restriction on the domain of permissible theories,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012724352
We argue that large elections may exhibit a moral bias, i.e., conditional on the distribution of preferences within the electorate, alternatives understood by voters to be morally superior are more likely to win in large elections than in small ones. This bias can result from ethical expressive...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014208011