Showing 1 - 10 of 2,623
Our paper considers a 'negotiation game' between two players which combines the features of two-players alternating offers bargaining and repeated games. Generally, the negotiation game in general admits a large number of equilibriums but some of which involve delay and inefficiency. Thus,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014171511
Are individuals always better off when their preferences can be represented by expected utility?I study this question in a bargaining game where individuals bargain over a pie of fixed size, and I contrast the share received in the long-run by expected utility maximisers with the share they...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012909950
Experiments in which subjects play simultaneously several finite prisoner's dilemma supergames with and without an outside option reveal that: (i) subjects use probabilistic start and endeffect behaviour, (ii) the freedom to choose whether to play the prisoner's dilemma game enhances...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014179648
We study experimentally a two-stage compensation mechanism for promoting cooperation in prisoner's dilemma games. In stage 1, players simultaneously choose binding non-negative amounts to pay their counterparts for cooperating in a given prisoner's dilemma game, and then play the prisoner's...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014057940
We report the results of ultimatum game experiments designed to test for differences in the behavior of women and men. Women's proposals are on average more generous than men's, regardless of the sex of the partner, and women respondents are more likely to accept an offer of a given amount. A...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014182174
I consider two new simple bargaining games in which two players bargain over division of a fixed amount of money. Both games are strategically equivalent to the dictator game, in that one player has the unilateral ability to determine the allocation. However, that player can instead choose to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014047994
This paper uses data from a natural experiment to compare two institutions: a simple English auction and bilateral bargaining. It appears that bilateral bargaining may be more profitable for the seller. Results also suggest no correlation between bargaining skills and an ability to make profit...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014053617
We consider infinite-horizon bargaining in which an uninformed seller sequentially makes a price offer to a privately informed buyer who decides whether to accept or reject it in every bargaining round. Existing theories suggest that the presence (absence) of an arbitrarily small outside option...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014077327
Mentalising is assumed to be involved in decision-making that is necessary to social interaction. We investigated the relationship between mentalising and two types of strategic games - those involving the choice to cooperate with another for joint gain or compete for own gain and those...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014085088
We introduce the moonlighting game. Player A can take money from or pass money to player B, who can either return money or punish player A. Thus, our game allows to study both positively and negatively reciprocal behaviour. One-shot experiments were conducted with and without the possibility of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014141311