Showing 1 - 10 of 13
We report results from an experiment that contrasts preferences toward the risk of what may happen (outcome risk preferences) with preferences toward the risk of when something may happen (time or delay risk preferences). Just as choices over monetary risks identify utility independently from...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012908536
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011399355
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012301575
Risk aversion—but also the higher-order risk preferences of prudence and temperance—are fundamental concepts in the study of economic decision making. We propose a method to jointly measure the intensity of risk aversion, prudence, and temperance. Our theoretical approach is to define risk...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010987807
Risk aversion — but also the higher-order risk preferences of prudence and temperance — are fundamental concepts in the study of economic decision making. We propose a method to jointly measure the intensity of risk aversion, prudence, and temperance. Our theoretical approach is to define...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014041927
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013124724
Skewness preferences—preferences toward low-probability, high-impact risks—are crucial determinants of economic behavior. This paper defines first- and higher-order skewness preferences and shows that the order of skewness preference captures the importance of skewness relative to mean and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013216569
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009267608
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010431558
We propose a method to measure the intensity of risk aversion, prudence (downside risk aversion) and temperance (outer risk aversion) in experiments. Higher-order risk compensations are defined within the proper risk apportionment model of Eeckhoudt and Schlesinger [American Economic Review, 96...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009124807