Showing 1 - 10 of 10
This comment points out four severe reservations regarding Cho et al.'s (PS 2017) finding that U.S. federal judges punish more harshly on “sleepy Mondays,” the Mondays after the start of Daylights Savings Time. First, Cho et al.'s finding pertains to only one of at least two dimensions of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011673868
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011581909
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012040156
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012427128
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012427129
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014528108
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014245416
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014245447
We review experimental research on judicial decision-making with a focus on methodological issues. First, we argue that only experiments with relatively high realism, in particular real judges as study subjects, plausibly generalize to judicial decision-making in the real world. Most...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014260075
Experimental research on judicial decision-making is hampered by the difficulty of recruiting judges as experimental participants. Can students be used in judges’ stead? Unfortunately, no. We ran the same high-context 2×2 factorial experiment of judicial decision-making focused on legal...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014260683