Showing 1 - 10 of 26
Participants in experimental games typically can only choose actions, without making comments about other participants’ future actions. In sequential two-person games, we allow first movers to express a preference between responder choices. We find that responder behavior differs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011131678
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001775988
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001696866
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001705847
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002117635
Departures from self-interest in economic experiments have recently inspired models of ?social preferences?. We design a range of simple experimental games that test these theories more directly than existing experiments. Our experiments show that subjects are more concerned with increasing...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014159132
How do people compare bundles of social-distancing behaviors? During the COVID pandemic, we showed 676 online respondents in the US, UK, and Israel 30 pairs of brief videos of acquaintances meeting. We asked them to indicate which in each pair depicted greater risk of COVID infection. Their...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014076972
This paper describes results of a pair of incentivized experiments on biases in judgments about random samples. Consistent with the Law of Small Numbers (LSN), participants exaggerated the likelihood that short sequences and random subsets of coin flips would be balanced between heads and tails....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012946183
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003896776
An experiment by Tversky and Kahneman (1981) illustrates that people's tendency to evaluate risky decisions separately can lead them to choose combinations of choices that are first-order stochastically dominated by other available combinations. We investigate the generality of this effect both...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003561617