Showing 1 - 10 of 13
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001523176
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010196968
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003841240
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010469798
Intertemporal tradeoffs are ubiquitous in decision making, yet preferences for current versus future losses are rarely explored in empirical research. Whereas rational-economic theory posits that neither outcome sign (gains vs. losses) nor outcome magnitude (small vs. large) should affect delay...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014174452
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011991719
Disruption of function of left, but not right, lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) with low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) increased choices of immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards. rTMS did not change choices involving only delayed rewards or valuation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014175638
Disruption of function of left, but not right, lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) with low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) increased choices of immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards. RTMS did not change choices involving only delayed rewards or valuation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014175763
Much of decision aiding uses a divide-and-conquer strategy to help people with risky decisions. Assessing the utility of outcomes and one's degree of belief in their likelihood are assumed to be separable tasks, the results of which can then be combined to determine the preferred alternative....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014046946
This paper examines the effect of characteristics of the decision situation and of the decision maker on decision processes and outcomes in the context of risky choice. Male and female undergraduate students were presented with decisions from different domains of life. For each decision they...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014047028